01Order of operations
Most of what roughly three decades in investment management taught me came from the positions that went wrong slowly enough for me to watch. The lesson was never that the analysis had been careless. It was that the analysis had begun in the wrong place. I had started with what a company could become and worked backward to what I was willing to pay. The order has to run the other way. Now I begin with what the business earns when nothing goes right, what it owes and to whom, and what I would be left holding if the story ended tomorrow. Only after those answers are written down do I allow myself to think about the upside.
02A private firm
The firms I founded and ran in Boston taught me a second thing, which is that the structure of an investment firm shapes the investments it makes. A firm that has to explain every position to a committee, a consultant, or a quarterly letter will, over time, buy things that are easy to explain. The firm I am part of today, Emerald Coast Holdings, is private, and I prefer it that way. A private firm can hold a position through the period when it looks wrong, can decline a crowded opportunity without having to justify the empty space, and can spend a year on a lower middle market company that no public analyst will ever cover. The freedom is not in doing more. It is in being allowed to do less, more carefully.
Being early is indistinguishable from being wrong, and it stays that way for longer than most investors can stand.
03The cost of being early
Contrarian positioning is the part of this work that people misunderstand, usually because they picture it as a temperament. It is a cost. Being early is indistinguishable from being wrong, and it stays that way for longer than most investors can stand. The position sits there, the market keeps disagreeing, and there is no outside evidence that you are right until, quite suddenly, there is. What the cost buys is a price that already assumes the worst, which is the only kind of price that leaves room for a mistake in the underwriting. I have been wrong often enough to want that room. I am willing to be uncomfortable in exchange for it, and I have learned not to hold a contrarian view in anything I do not understand better than the people selling it to me.
Independent research is how I earn the right to disagree. I do not mean ignoring the consensus. I mean reading the same documents everyone else can read and doing the arithmetic myself, because the consensus is already in the price and my own work is the only thing that is not. Long term value follows from that habit. A position held for years is not a bet on patience for its own sake. It is what happens when the underwriting was right and the market takes its time agreeing.
04Involvement
Active involvement is the last piece, and it is the least glamorous. In venture debt, private credit, and the distressed situations I work in, the documents are only as good as the lender's willingness to use them. That means reading the monthly numbers when they arrive, calling when they do not, sitting with management when the plan changes, and being the creditor who shows up prepared. None of this turns a bad investment into a good one. It is how a sound investment stays sound through the years it takes to be paid.
I write about these themes regularly at peterdecaprioinsights.com, and I have found that setting a thesis out in plain sentences is a fair test of whether it deserves capital. If it cannot survive being written down, it should not survive being funded.
If it cannot survive being written down, it should not survive being funded.
Peter DeCaprioMember, Emerald Coast Holdings LLC